Vision by Parallel Digital
Capital project intelligence

One platform.
Every project dimension.

Project Vision unifies schedule, cost, quality, risk, and HSE data across your entire capital project portfolio — turning scattered data sources into a continuously learning intelligence layer.

Built forOil & GasMining & ResourcesEnergy TransitionRail & InfrastructureLNG & Petrochemical
14
Data domains
5
Benchmarking tiers
6
Project lifecycle stages
Projects & customers
Project surveillance

Every department. One unified view.

Eleven purpose-built surveillance pages cover the full capital project execution lifecycle. Each page reads from a live data layer and surfaces the signal that matters — including cross-domain signals that show when a problem in one area is about to affect another.

  • Real-time cost, schedule, quality, materials, HSE, and commissioning tracking against your locked baseline
  • Cross-domain signals surface when a materials shortage is about to block construction — before it happens
  • Traffic-light thresholds set per project — every KPI card reflects your actual governance standards, not hardcoded defaults
  • AI-generated plain English narrative with three specific recommended actions per page
Cost Control · Active Project
Is this project within budget?
At risk — cost overrun accelerating in Mechanical and Piping
CPI
0.87
↓ 0.04 vs prior
EAC
$284M
↑ $36M vs plan
Labour %
58.3%
→ Stable
PLANACTUALFORECAST
Contributing factors
Mechanical materials shortage
3 critical items late — construction blockage expected in 14 days
Piping crew productivity declining
Productivity index fell 18% over 3 weeks — feeding cost overrun
Predictive analytics

Machine learning that explains itself.

Two layers of ML work in parallel. Gradient-boosted ensemble models forecast schedule delay, cost overrun probability, and quality trends from task and inspection records. A separate neural network forecasts how KPIs will move over time — trained on each project's own benchmark snapshot series.

  • Ensemble models for task-level delay and quality predictions — trained per project, per discipline
  • Neural network forecasts SPI, CPI, defect rate, and productivity trends from snapshot history with confidence intervals
  • Feature importance surfaced in plain English — the three main drivers of each forecast, not a black box
  • Human challenge mechanism: users correct wrong attributions, the model learns from accurate challenges over time
Timeline Predictions · SPI forecast
Will this project finish on time?
At risk — forecast 23-day overrun, 68% confidence
TODAYP50
Why the model predicts this
Piping discipline 34 days behind plan (41% of delay risk) · Critical path dependency density (29%) · Mechanical rework above average (18%)
Challenged by A. Singh · Apr 18 · "Delay is material-driven, not productivity"
View
Benchmarking tiers

Four levels of intelligence, one platform.

A structured four-tier benchmarking hierarchy gives every stakeholder the right view at the right scope — from a single project's KPI percentile to anonymised industry-wide distributions that grow more accurate with every consented project that completes.

  • View 1: single project ranked against comparable projects grouped by sector, type, and scale
  • Views 2 & 3: Project Admin — customer portfolio or full cross-portfolio comparison with heatmap and cluster analysis
  • View 4: industry intelligence — consent-gated, fully anonymised P10–P90 distributions, suppressed below three contributing projects
  • Each completed consented project automatically enriches the FEA analogue pool and industry distributions
Benchmarking · four-tier hierarchy
1
Project Benchmarks — single project
Active project · Cluster 3: Oil & Gas brownfield >$200M
SPI P34CPI P23Quality P41Productivity P58
2
Customer portfolio
3 projects · admin-only view
2 at risk1 on trackAvg CPI 0.93
3
Full portfolio — Project Admin
8 projects · 3 customers · cross-portfolio heatmap
3 on track3 at risk2 critical
4
Industry Intelligence — anonymised
Consented projects only · P10–P90 distributions · ≥3 cohort minimum
18 contributors3 sectorsConsent-gated
Pre-execution intelligence

Estimate the next project from the last ten.

The Front-End Assessment engine embeds each completed project's profile and outcomes into a high-dimensional vector. Similarity search finds the closest analogues, then derives P10, P50, and P90 ranges from their real outcomes.

  • Semantic embedding over project profile and outcome vectors — analogues found by meaning, not just category labels
  • P10/P50/P90 cost and schedule distributions derived from the distribution of real analogue outcomes
  • FID Assessment: four-dimension viability review with LLM narrative, admin review, full auditable decision trail
  • Every project that completes and consents enriches future FEA estimates — accuracy compounds over time
FEA Assessment · analogous project matching
What would a comparable project cost?
Oil & Gas · Process facility · EPC delivery · 18 consented analogues
P10 cost
$910M
P50 cost
$1.12B
P90 cost
$1.38B
P10 schedule
26 mo
P50 schedule
34 mo
P90 schedule
42 mo
Top analogues · similarity score
LNG facility — Western Australia
Oil & Gas · $1.1B · 36 months actual
0.94
LNG facility — Queensland
Oil & Gas · $980M · 31 months actual
0.91
Offshore LNG terminal — Northern Territory
Oil & Gas · $1.25B · 40 months actual
0.87
Platform expansion
Three new capability layers
⚙️
Asset Performance

Reliability engineering, built in.

FMEA → RCFA → SIL → RCM → Spares → Asset Health Score. The full reliability chain in one module, connected to your existing schedule and quality data.

FMEA worksheet, criticality Pareto, one-click RCFA launch
SIL Review with LOPA calculator and proof-test scheduling
RCM decision tree (SAE JA1011) with interval optimiser
Asset Health Score + 30/60/90-day action calendar
Asset Health Score47
FMEA risk index74.9%
SIL compliance40.0%
Maintenance readiness23.8%
Critical spares50.0%
🌿
ESG & Carbon

Scope 1, 2, and 3 — no extra system.

Carbon footprint computed from data already in the platform. GRI and ISSB S2 disclosure PDF generated automatically. No separate ESG tool required.

Scope 1/2/3 from energy imports and materials register
Workforce composition, social equity, community metrics
TCFD risk tagging and target on-track indicators
GRI 302/305/401/403/413 · ISSB S2 · CSRD-ready PDF
Scope 1
606
tCO₂e
Scope 2
784
tCO₂e
Scope 3
13,986
tCO₂e
Carbon intensity32.7 tCO₂e / $M
🏭
Stage 6 — Operations

The platform doesn't stop at handover.

Transition to Stage 6 and the dashboard switches to operations mode. FMEA flows into live bad-actor rankings. Predictive maintenance activates.

Availability, throughput, unit cost, OPEX dashboard
ML failure classifier — 30-day risk per equipment class
RAM Synopsis — OEM vs actual interval benchmarking
Cross-project MTBF and EPC quality signature ML
94.2%
Availability
91.8%
Throughput
K-200B HP compressor · 30-day risk68%
K-100A instrument air · FMEA fallback34%
Intelligence architecture
How the ML layers work together
Three distinct intelligence layers operate in parallel — each trained on different data at a different granularity, feeding into a unified output layer.
INPUTSML LAYERSOUTPUTSSchedule / TasksXER · MSPDI · CSVCost recordsPeriod actuals · WBSQuality / HSEInspections · eventsManpowerCrew · productivityKPI snapshotsBenchmark series over timeCompleted projectsHistorical outcomesENSEMBLE MODELS · per project · per disciplineRegressiontask delay · cost overrunClassificationquality · defect rateGradient Boostingmanpower · productivityFeature importanceplain English driversNEURAL NETWORKtime-series forecastingSPI · CPI · quality trendsP10 / P50 / P90 intervalsEMBEDDINGSvector embeddingscosine similarity searchanalogous project matchingSurveillance insightsKPI status · cross-domain signalscontributing factors · AI narrativePredictive forecastsCompletion date · EAC · qualityconfidence bands · feature driversKPI trend forecastSPI · CPI · defect rate over timeP10 / P50 / P90 trajectoryFEA analogous matchingP10 / P50 / P90 cost & schedule rangesranked analogues · similarity scoresData flows into ML layerIntelligence flows to outputsML model (trained per project)Output surfaces in the platform
Platform capabilities
Built for the full project lifecycle
📊

Unified data ingestion

Import schedule (P6 XER, MS Project MSPDI), cost, manpower, materials, HSE, commissioning, compliance, energy, ESG social, and environmental data from any format. AI-assisted column mapping resolves terminology differences automatically. 14 data domains, all in one platform.

AI mapping14 data domainsXER · MSPDI · CSV · XLSX
🧠

Ensemble models, neural networks, and portfolio ML

Ensemble models forecast task-level outcomes per discipline. A neural network forecasts KPI trends with confidence intervals. Portfolio-level cross-project models predict equipment reliability and contractor quality patterns across all consented projects.

Ensemble modelsNeural networkPortfolio ML

Cross-domain signal engine

A declarative influence registry tracks causal relationships between data domains — materials shortages that will block construction, productivity declines driving cost overruns, HSE leading indicators predicting incident risk. Signals surface automatically on every surveillance page and in the APM 30/60/90-day calendar.

Causal reasoningReal-time signalsCross-domain
🌿

Built-in ESG and carbon reporting

Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions computed at import from canonical emission factor libraries (NGER 2024, EU EN 15940, ICE v3.3). GRI 302/305/401/403/413 and ISSB S2-aligned disclosure PDF generated from the same canonical tables. TCFD risk tagging, ESG target on-track indicators, and third-party assurance-ready data trails included.

GRI · ISSB S2 · TCFDPDF disclosureCSRD-ready
🔐

Role-aware, multi-project

Built for organisations managing multiple projects across multiple customers. Role-based access, per-user use case gating, and customer data isolation are foundational — not bolted on. Admins see everything; viewers see exactly what they need. APM and ESG modules gate separately to the relevant team members.

Multi-tenantRole-based accessCustomer isolation
🏭

Full lifecycle — construction to operations

Six project stages from FEA through to Operations and Historical. Transitioning to Stage 6 unlocks the operational dashboard (availability, throughput, unit cost), two new import tabs, and the predictive maintenance engine. Construction FMEA flows into operational bad-actor rankings. The platform grows with your asset.

6 lifecycle stagesOps dashboardPredictive maint.
Data lifecycle
A continuously improving intelligence layer
Every project that passes through the platform enriches the next FEA estimate. The intelligence compounds.
FEA
Analogous matching · P10/P50/P90 · Risk identification
Estimation
Baseline set · Cost plan · Resource plan locked
Active
Live surveillance · ML forecasting · EVM live
Completing
Close-out · Final forecast · APM & ESG readiness
Operations
Availability · Predictive maint. · OPEX tracking · RAM
Historical
Joins analogue pool · Enriches industry benchmarks
VISION
by Parallel Digital
Ready to unify your project intelligence?
Join the capital project teams using real-time data, ensemble machine learning, APM reliability engineering, and ESG carbon intelligence to deliver with confidence — from first estimates through to operations.
Built forOil & GasMining & ResourcesEnergy TransitionRail & InfrastructureLNG & Petrochemical